Here Is Your Hope and Change

Obama Will Soon Declare The Constitution--Unconstitutional!

John Lillpop

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Granted that conservatives are not always the sharpest knives in the drawer.

We right-wingers sometimes have difficulty grasping the deep, elusive logic

of intellectual elitists on the left like Barack Obama when it comes to great

and serious questions concerning the U.S. Constitution.

For example, we find it difficult to understand how it is that man who invented

ObamaCare, which has been ruled unconstitutional by two separate courts,

feels qualified to unilaterally decide that the Defense of Marriage Act,

law of the land for 15 years, is suddenly unconstitutional, thereby freeing himself

from the responsibility to defend said law in fulfillment of his Oath of Office.

What next, Mr. President?

According to unreliable sources, it appears that President Obama will make a

major announcement that will CHANGE everything in America.

The gist of that announcement:

The U.S. Constitution is unconstitutional because women and racial, sexual

preference, and religious minorities were all under represented in 1776.

Indeed, without any openly gay men or transgender people involved in the crafting

of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, all such

documents must be declared null and void.

Other excluded minorities include women, terrorists, and illegal aliens.

Without factoring in the wishes and needs of terrorists and illegal aliens how in the

world can our democracy function?

The answer, of course, is that it cannot, which is why

Obama will soon declare the Constitution itself unconstitutional!

Of course, if Obama really gave a tinker’s dam about the Constitution,

He would scrap his outrageous law suit against the state of Arizona for

protecting its citizens from invaders.

He would move to scrap ObamaCare, which was rammed down the throats

of unwilling Americans with legislative sleight of hands and bribery when the

votes were not there to follow the rules.

He would understand that forcing citizens to purchase health care insurance,

or face the ravages of the IRS, is barbaric and unconstitutional.

He would understand that the Constitution is very specific when it comes to the

eligibility of any person to serve as president.

Thus, he would make every effort to be completely honest and transparent with

the American people concerning questions about his own eligibility.

He would understand that the Constitution sets forth provisions for separation of

powers, meant to assure that the Executive Branch is accountable to the people

through the oversight function performed by Congress.

He would understand that installation of stealth Czars in order to circumvent

Congressional oversight is a repudiation of the Constitution.

He would understand that voter intimidation by the New Black Panther Party

is not acceptable simply because the intimidated are not people of color.

He would understand that actions taken to grant rights reserved for citizens to

terrorists are anti-American acts of treason.

He would understand that the Constitution requires the president to secure our

borders and enforce our immigration laws so as to protect the American people.

He would understand that it is the president’s Constitutional obligation to serve

as America’s Commander-in-Chief, which requires him to use war powers prudently

to defend the American people, rather than using those powers as political footballs.

Above all else, if he were genuine, President Obama would understand that the will

of the people should be the first priority for any political entity wishing to govern, and

that that applies to taxes, illegal invasions, health care, terrorists, and all major issues

of the day.

The fact is that Barack Obama views the Constitution as an impediment

to his Marxist agenda.

He MUST be stopped.

72 Virgins ?

When Obama died, George Washington
met him at the Pearly Gates.
He slapped him across the face and yelled,
"How dare you try to destroy the nation
I helped conceive?"

Patrick Henry approached,
punched him in the nose and shouted,
"You wanted to end our liberties but you failed."

James Madison followed,
kicked him in the groin and said,
"This is why I allowed our government to
provide for the common defense!"

Thomas Jefferson was next,
beat Obama with a long cane and snarled,
"It was evil men like you who inspired me to
write the Declaration of Independence ."

The beatings and thrashings continued as
George Mason, James Monroe and 66 other
early Americans unleashed their anger on
the radical, socialist, leader.

As Obama lay bleeding and in pain, an Angel appeared.
Obama wept and said, "This is not what you promised me."

The Angel replied, "I told you there would be 72 VIRGINIANS
waiting for you in Heaven. What did you think I said".....
"You really need to listen when someone is trying
to tell you something!"

Broward County CAIR Director Confronts Allen West At Townhall 2-21-2011

For the second Townhall in a row, Nezar Hamze

(Executive Director of the Broward County Fl.

Chapter of CAIR) confronted Congressman

Allen West's interpretations and

explanations of the Muslim religion.

And for the second time Allen OWNED him.

Video below:

Country Boy

Gov't, Obama Ignore Immigration Law

As Americans we have a lot to worry about: OBAMACARE, debt ceiling,

unemployment rates, political elections, and much more.

The Illegal Immigration issue, one of the biggest problems facing a

nation crying for jobs, has slipped to the "back seat" of what is driving

the U.S. government.

We've "uncovered" an EXISTING LAW that our own government has effectively

NULLIFIED by simply choosing not to enforce it. Had the federal government done

its job, we, as a nation, would not be facing such an illegal immigration disaster.

As a friend of freedom and the United States Constitution, you cannot escape the

unbelievable situation that we now face. And the Executive Branch of the federal

government---since 1952---is to blame. They simply chose NOT to enforce this law.

Why?

Most likely because major donors to major political candidates who use

migrant labor to plant and harvest food crops did not want this law enforced.

The law?

The Federal Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.

It's still on the books. It's STILL the law of the land!

Yet, NO U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL is enforcing this law today!

No Immigration Control & Enforcement agents are arresting the illegal aliens

they catch under this law; nor are they arresting the benefactors who offer

illegal aliens sanctuary to avoid arrest and deportation.

Not one. Nor did ICE or the Justice Department enforce that law yesterday,

or last year, or at anytime in the last six decades.

Yet, it's still a law.

And it will end the illegal immigration problem if it is enforced.

Why is everyone ignoring this law?

It's time to ask every Member of Congress why no U.S. Attorney General

is enforcing this law. Ask them why they have not called any Executive

Branch official, Director of Immigration Control & Enforcement [ICE], or any

U.S. Attorney General, before a Congressional Committee to explain why

the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 has never been

enforced one time in the last 59 years.

Demand to know why Congress has said it is trying to stop illegal immigration,

even though Public Law 82-414, has never been enforced.

It's time to drag this law out of mothballs and demand that the federal

government apply its provisions not only against the illegals who swarm

across our borders like locusts, but also to prosecute those who

harbor illegals in sanctuary cities.

It's up to us.

The last 12 presidential administrations have ignored this law.

We're facing 11 "skeletons" in the closet, but there is still time to do something

about it before there are an even dozen.

The Federal Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 may not have been the total

answer to the illegal immigration problem in the United States, but it offered the

best solution to date. While the Immigration Reform Act of 1965 abolished the

"national origins" formula (a racial quota system) found in the 1952 law, most of the

law's statutes are still on the books. They are the law of the land---

providing the U.S. Attorney General or the Director of ICE enforces them.

The Federal Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 was a tough law to enact since

it was a Democrat-controlled Congress that overrode a Democrat President's veto by a

margin in the Senate of 57-26 and in the House of Representatives, 278-113.

The law mirrored the feelings of the voters in the United States about illegal immigration.

Other than some minor revisions in the 1965 and 1986 laws, the 1952 Immigration Law is

still in effect. Here is what you need to know...

here is what the United States Congress must be made aware of:

NONE OF THE SUBSEQUENT LAWS RESCINDED

THE PUNITIVE ENFORCEMENT MEASURES OF

THE ORIGINAL 1952 IMMIGRATION LAW!

You are a felon if you enter this country illegally. If you offer aid and comfort to an illegal alien

you are in violation of Section 8[a](1)(A)[iv][b](iii) of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act.

It is a crime punishable by a fine of $10 thousand per infraction or imprisonment in a federal

penitentiary for not more than five (5) years---or both.

It is U.S. law.

Yet, NO ONE is ever charged for violating this law.

If the illegal residing in a room rented to him (or her) by you commits a crime,

the law makes you liable for any loss incurred by the victim of that crime.

Yet, no victims were ever compensated for the losses suffered at the hand of an

illegal alien who robbed or assaulted them under the compensation provision in this law.

The American people have been waiting 59 years for this law to "kick-in."

Don't you think it's time that the Attorney General and the Director of

ICE enforced a law demanded by the American people?

CALL--EMAIL--FAX your Representative & Senator!!

Ask then WHY, when they SWORE to up-hold the LAWS of The United States,

they Choose to ignore The Federal Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.

Illegals DEMAND their rights! It's time they had them through

the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.

Doctors Helping Teacher Protesters Lie about Being 'Sick'

2-19-2011

MediaTrackers is on the scene for today’s protests

in Madison. They captured this doctor on video

signing ’sick’ forms for union members skipping work.

As you know, hundreds of schools across the state have

been forced closed because teachers have called in ’sick.’

Yet another good lesson to be teaching the next generation.

YEA!! Another Chance To Get Rid of Alcee Hasting

Dear Friends,

After 3 months of reflection and heavy meditation,
I filed this morning with the Bureau of Elections in
Tallahassee as a candidate for US Congress for
District 23 FL for 2012.

I learned a lot from last year run; we are going to run
a much different campaign this time. Last year was a
good trial run, 2012 will be our Victory Year.

Friends, I also thank you for all the support you gave me
last year, I am praying and hoping for the same in 2012.

I know for sure we can achieve VICTORY next year.
2012 will be a very interesting Year !

Sincerely

Bernard Sansaricq
Candidate for US Congress- District 23 FL.

GUN OWNERS--FLORIDA CARRY LEGISLATIVE ALERT

SB 234 - FL Senate Committee on Criminal Justice Hearing scheduled for 2/22/11

SB 234 is on the agenda of the FL Senate Committee on Criminal Justice

on Tuesday, February 22nd at 9:00am. Florida Carry, Inc. urgently requests that you

email via the members of the committee in support of Senate Bill 234.

This NRA authored bill comprises several separate initiatives.

These include the option for CWFL holders to carry openly; a provision to authorize

carry at career centers, colleges, and universities; the right to store a firearm in

one's vehicle wherever it may be lawfully parked;

the authorization for the Department of Agriculture to take fingerprints;

the repeal of Florida’s ban on long gun purchases in most other states.

Quite simply put, this is the most comprehensive carry rights bill since shall-issue

concealed carry was passed twenty-four years ago.

Florida is one of only seven states where open carry of firearms is generally

forbidden, excepting under certain circumstances. Arguments against open

carry generally consist of concerns regarding the fearful reactions of the

general population. Some have suggested that an open carrier becomes an

instant target, having his firearm snatched by a criminal in line at a convenience

store. The facts simply do not support those allegations. In states where open carry

is lawfully practiced, citizens have become accustomed to the understanding that

a holstered weapon is a danger to no one. There have been no wholesale attacks on

open carriers, nor have open carriers been shot with their own weapons.

Police officers are not fearful of open carriers as they know that a 5-year FBI

crime study has shown that criminals do not open carry, nor do they carry in holsters.

Criminals shun attention, something that the open carrying of a firearm invariably

draws to some extent. Not a single state that has legalized open carry in recent years

has repealed the right.

In 1987, open carry was outlawed primarily because of the predictions of

wild west shootouts, blood in the streets, gun battles over parking spaces,

and normally law abiding people indiscriminately becoming homicidal maniacs.

The main opponent of open carry was Janet Reno, then assistant state attorney.

She was able to rally support from a vocal group of police administrators with

the doom and gloom scenarios. Amazingly enough, the exact same arguments

were heard against "shall-issue" concealed carry. Twenty-four years later, and

none of the rampant bloodshed predictions about concealed carry have come true.

With regard to carry on colleges and universities, it is not coincidence that most

of the mass shootings in the U.S. occur on the campuses of educational institutions.

To believe that a potential assailant would be dissuaded from committing mass

murder simply because there is a law forbidding him to bring a firearm on campus

is pure folly. Rape, robbery, assault, and murder have all occurred on campuses

across the country.

College and university administrators continue to deny the reality that by

prohibiting students, faculty, staff, and visitors from defending themselves

promotes an unsafe environment. Often ignored by opponents is the fact that

only concealed weapons/firearms license holders would be permitted to carry

on campus, and the minimum age requirement to have a license is 21. Those

students under 21 would not be permitted to carry on campus. Once again,

the potential criminals do not care about minimum age or having a license.

After all, there are no barriers to access on most campuses. Florida Carry, Inc.

supports SB 234, and encourages all gun owners/carriers to join us in contacting

the senators on the Florida Senate Criminal Justice Committee.

Please tell them 24 years is enough.

We urgently need you to email the committee members NOW!

Include “Support SB 234” in the Subject Line

E-mail Helper (feel free to cut, paste, and edit to suit) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

TO: evers.greg.web@flsenate.gov dean.charles.web@flsenate.gov dockery.paula.web@flsenate.gov margolis.gwen.web@flsenate.gov smith.chris.web@flsenate.gov

SUBJECT: Support SB 234 – Support the Second Amendment

Dear Senator,

This e-mail is to express my support for Senate Bill 234, Firearms.

As a member of the Florida Senate Committee on Criminal Justice,

you will be hearing this bill on Tuesday, February 22nd.

I respectfully ask that you wholeheartedly support this bill.

The predictions of doom and gloom that preceded the adoption of "shall-issue"

concealed carry have been proven to be fiction. For twenty-four years,

Florida concealed weapons/firearms license holders have proven themselves

to be responsible to the extreme. Since 1987, only 168 of nearly two-million

licenses have been revoked due to misuse of firearms. It is time to recognize

that responsibility by giving those licensees the option to carry their firearms

in the manor that is most appropriate to their situation, openly or concealed.

In the 43 states that permit some form of general open carry, not a single state

has repealed that right.

It is also time to recognize that criminals have discovered a target-rich environment

at colleges and universities. Rapes, robberies, assaults, and other violent crimes

continually occur at and near campuses on students, faculty, and staff alike.

Concealed weapons/firearms license holders should not have to relinquish the ability

to defend themselves because of a mistaken belief that criminals obey campus

restrictions.

Please support SB 234.

Respectfully yours,

Name and zip code

Congressman Allen West Closes CPAC

Baptizing A Drunk

Baptizing A Drunk

A man is stumbling through the woods totally drunk when he comes
upon a preacher baptizing people in the river. The drunk walks into
the water and subsequently bumps into the preacher. The preacher
turns around and is almost overcome by the smell of booze.
Whereupon he asks the drunk, 'Are you ready to find Jesus?'

'Yes I am' replies the drunk, so the preacher grabs him and dunks
him in the river. He pulls him up and asks the drunk,
'Brother, have you found Jesus?'

The drunk replies, 'No, I haven't.' The preacher, shocked at the answer,
dunks him into the water again, but for a bit longer this time.
He pulls him out of the water and asks again,
'Have you found Jesus, my brother?'

The drunk again answers, 'No, I have not found Jesus.'
By this time the preacher is at his wits end so he dunks the drunk
in the water again, but this time he holds him down for about 30 seconds.

When the drunk begins kicking his arms and legs,
the preacher pulls him up. The preacher asks the drunk again,
'For the love of God, have you found Jesus?'

The drunk wipes his eyes and catches his breath and says to the preacher,

'Are you sure this is where he fell in?'

Reliable Forecast Under The Weather

By Michael Graham

Boston Herald Op-Ed





Meet the global weirdos.

They’re the ones telling you that all the snow outside

is proof that it’s getting warmer.

Only, they don’t call it “warming” anymore.



No, that was back in the “Earth has a fever” days.

Back when Al Gore was predicting that the ice caps

were melting, the polar bears were drowning and

Manhattan would sink beneath 20 feet of water

“in the near future.”



But then something happened.

Since 1998, temperatures have been relatively flat.

We’ve got more polar bears than ever, and Manhattan

is buried under snow. For a planet-roasting crisis that

threatened the human race with extinction, there doesn’t

seem to be much actual warming.



So then the mantra became “climate change.”

The liberals formerly known as “warmists” began predicting

that we would experience fundamental changes in our weather.

Scientists at the University of East Anglia —

the Harvard of climate change —

said snow would be “a very rare and exciting event.”

Children wouldn’t know what it was.



As for summers, in the wake of Katrina “change-ist” groups

like realclimate.org predicted “global warming will make

hurricanes even worse in the future.”



What happened? Nothing.

Europe has had three winters in a row of snow and cold

temperatures. In the Atlantic, “there has been a dramatic

decrease in the number of hurricanes in the last five years,”

according to meteorologist Art Horn.

“The total energy in all hurricanes around the world has

plunged since 1993. The opposite of what was predicted.”



So the new fall back is “global weirding.”

The site thedailygreen.com has a “Weird Weather Watch” page.

The uber-liberal Huffington Post ran a story in August headlined

“Global Weirding”: Extreme Climate Events Dominate The Summer.”



“The extreme climate events all across the globe must say

something about whether climate change is already upon us,”

the HuffPo insisted. “Extreme is the new normal.”



They quote a professor of “environmental studies and politics”

from Oberlin College who says, “More hottest hots, driest dries,

wettest wets, windiest wind conditions. So it’s all part of a pattern.”



Gore is on board, too.

He’s now merely claiming rising temperatures will “create all

sorts of havoc, ranging from hotter dry spells to colder winters.”



Not “warming,” but “weirding.”

Not “heating,” but “havoc.”

Which is how global warming can cause more snow,

less snow, no snow, avalanches, heat waves, cold snaps,

wetter wets, drier dries, gingivitis, delirium tremens and

irritable bowel syndrome  . . . all at the same time!



Global warming — is there anything it can’t do?



Well, the one thing it apparently doesn’t do is help predict

the weather. The UK’s Met Office stopped giving seasonal

forecasts last year after mis-predicting warmer winters

three years in a row. Meteorologists without a warmist

agenda like Piers Corbyn and AccuWeather’s Joe Bastardi,

on the other hand, continue to pay the bills by making

predictions directly contrary to the “weirdos.”



Oddly, they don’t have degrees in politics.



For a theory to be scientific, it must be fallible —

capable of being proven false. If every weather condition

can be used to “prove” global warming simply by being

declared “weird,” then it’s not science. It’s a joke.



Which is exactly what the environmental movement has become.

B-b-b-but it's his fault

The Washington Post babbled again today about Obama inheriting a huge deficit from Bush. Amazingly enough, a lot of people swallow this nonsense.
So once more, a short civics lesson.

Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.

Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for FY 2008 and FY 2009 as well as FY 2010 and FY 2011.

In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.

For FY 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the FY 2009 budgets.

And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete FY 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period: (below)

If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the FY 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.

If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.

In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.

How To Starve an Obama Supporter??

Hide their food stamps under their work shoes.